A Framework for Comparing Alternative Formalisms for Plausible Reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
We present a logical relationship between a small number of intuitive properties for measures of belief and the axioms of probability theory. The relationship was first demonstrated several decades ago but has remained obscure. We introduce the proof and discuss its relevance to research on reasoning under uncertainty in artificial intelligence. In particular, we demonstrate that the logical relationship can facilitate the identification of differences among alternative plausible reasoning methodologies. Finally, we make use of the relationship to examine popular non-probabilistic strategies.
منابع مشابه
SeDAn: a Plausible Reasoning Approach for Semantics-based Data Analytics in Healthcare
Plausible Reasoning (PR) is an inferencing mechanism to derive solutions when dealing with incomplete knowledge. When developing data-driven models for clinical decision support, the completeness of the data is always a consideration. PR provides a practical approach to extend the knowledge-base of a clinical decision support system by abstracting plausible assertions from heath data. Implement...
متن کاملThe Comparative Linguistics of Knowledge Representation
We develop a methodology for comparing knowledge representation formalisms in terms of their "representational succinctness," that is, their abi l i ty to express knowledge situations relatively efficiently. We use this framework for comparing many important formalisms for knowledge base representation: propositional logic, default logic, circumscription, and model preference defaults; and, at ...
متن کاملThe Comparative Linguistics of Knowledge
We develop a methodology for comparing knowledge representation formalisms in terms of their \representational succinctness," that is, their ability to express knowledge situations relatively eeciently. We use this framework for comparing many important formalisms for knowledge base representation: propositional logic, default logic, circumscription, and model preference defaults; and, at a low...
متن کاملChoice of Plausible Alternatives: An Evaluation of Commonsense Causal Reasoning
Research in open-domain commonsense reasoning has been hindered by the lack of evaluation metrics for judging progress and comparing alternative approaches. Taking inspiration from large-scale question sets used in natural language processing research, we authored one thousand English-language questions that directly assess commonsense causal reasoning, called the Choice Of Plausible Alternativ...
متن کاملA Multi-Formalism Modeling Framework: Formal Definitions, Model Composition and Solution Strategies
In this paper, we present a multi-formalism modeling framework (abbreviated by MFMF) for modeling and simulation. The proposed framework is defined based on the concepts of meta-models and uses object-orientation to overcome the complexities and to enhance the extensibility. The framework can be used as a basis for modeling by various formalisms and to support model composition in a unified man...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1986